and yet still it burns
Oct. 30th, 2026 08:01 pm( Read more... )
Land of the Lustrous is a beautiful piece of trans-humanist fiction that delves into the struggle of change, the doors of trauma in making the attempt, and the truth of the world around its characters. What has always stood out to me most, from the moment I began to watch and read the series, was its depiction of immortality.
I spoke with a friend about it, as we would watch. He disliked it and I loved it. When we talked about what we liked in immortality, he would speak of the wisdom and terrible age – the disconnect from being human. After so long, it is not easy or possible to remain the person you once were. For him, Land of the Lustrous had characters too childish to speak to the truth of what immortality was meant to be. They were flawed, impatient, even childish after hundreds and thousands of years.
To me, that was the best example one could give of the curse of immortality. It isn’t living forever. It was the fact that you could never grow up – that these gems had been shaped into a particular image by their protector that they were not allowed to change from without destroying some aspect of what he had created.
“If you’re shaped to be one thing all your life,” I found myself saying, “You’re not given the option to be an adult or a child.”
I realized I had a personal investment in the series’ depiction of immortality. The two of us acknowledged the sensation of being too old in a body that didn’t carry the same age as what we felt, but we responded in different ways. For him, it was a matter of being too mature for too long. For me, it was a matter of never being given the chance to gain any maturity, trapped in the image my abuser had created for me.
It was only when I acknowledged my experiences as abuse that I began to realize they had or were affecting me. Before that, they were relationships. Romantic. Familial. Sexual. In that same way, Phos’ changes are what open the door to admitting their own trauma – to realizing the problem with how Adamant seems to see them.
I had my first boyfriend at around 13 years old. I don’t remember the date closely. He was a family friend. Because of that, he knew I wasn’t on good terms with my family. When I was scared to go home, scared to stay there, he offered me a moment of protection. He was fun. We’d play video games together. Talk about anime. I’d never had any friends I could do that with before. He was always affectionate. And he would joke, about the two of us. Together.
One day, I confessed to him, and asked if I could kiss his cheek.
We would date for the next four years. He would propose to me.
In some ways, he saved me from my family.
Some abusers see themselves as saviours. Necessary to the life of their victim. It’s simple when it’s a child. It is easy when the victim isn’t even human.
They could be a gem.
They could be a plant.
In 2009, Haruko Ichikawa published two volumes of one shots. Each one stood as an individual chapter, all unrelated. The stories are best described as centered around the relationships between humans and non-humans.
Volume 1 begins with a one shot called “Star Lover.”
The premise is strange. A boy is staying with his uncle as his mother travels abroad. He meets someone his uncle refers to as his daughter. However, this young girl is not quite human – neither is the boy. His uncle informs him the girl is what grew from his severed finger, a few years back. That they’re both human constructs made from plant cells and his proof goes all the way to video documentation.
However, the story is not preoccupied with the scientific theory behind making fully sapient creatures from the cells of plants. It lingers on a boy who looks at a girl who grew from his own hand, and thinks, ‘She used to be a part of me.’
Her name is Tsutsuji.

She’s mature. She wakes up early to take care of her slacker father. When the boy points out how different the two of them are, she says, “Maybe it’s how I grew up.”
The three of them go to the park, to play, and have fun. Tsutsuji talks about growing up with her father. She talks about how nice it is to spend gentle days together with someone who could be called her brother. To be a family, to be given mulled wine for the two of them to drink together in the winter.
Mulled wine, she says, “tastes like the stars burning.”
The boy thinks over Tsutsuji, someone who grew from his finger, doing all these things.
“They were all once my finger,” he says.
“They were mine.”
Tsutsuji goes upstairs, and in a conversation with an unknown figure, says they have to be quiet.

The three of them go to the beach.
The two of them are not allowed to touch the ocean due to their bodies. But they can look, and appreciate. When her shoe breaks, Tsutsuji gives up on looking for seashells. No matter how they may heal, the two of them are still delicate. It’s just two of them in the world.
Tsutsuji wants to be like a sister to him. She speaks of roles that they have to play – she talks about choosing them. And with the boy, Tsutsuji wants a normal nice brother who will always play with her.
The boy refuses because “he wants to be one with her” again.
She pretends she did not hear him and runs back to her father.
Tsutsuji throws her broken shoes at her father. When he asks what’s wrong, she says, “Nothing.”
She’s upset. She falls on her father. Tsutsuji wants nothing more than to be a family. For things to be normal. And she takes the blame upon herself. She decides she has to be honest to him. She has no time to “feel homesick over his body.” Not when she is her father’s daughter, and his mother, and his lover.

Tsutsuji can say many things, as young as she is. As happy as her days are, they are filled with a worry that will not be fully verbalized.
With the misery the boy’s words bring her. With the ambivalent way her father treats the boy’s entreaty. With the truth to a relationship never explicitly shown.
Grooming is a poisonous thing.
I dated a man for the first time around 13 years old.
He had babysat me since I was 10.
We would have sex when I was 14.
He’d tell me how nice it was that I still had such a flat chest at 15.
The marriage proposal comes at 16.
I would break up with him at 17.
He would stalk me until 20.
At 18, it was a joke that I’d been dating a pedophile for a large chunk of my young life.
At 20, I started to realize otherwise.
Tsutsuji decides to help the boy. As her father sits at the table, casually eating breakfast, she goes outside. Tsutsuji doesn’t want to hurt the boy. She doesn’t want to disappoint her father. Not when she is essentially what the boy gave to his uncle years ago, to love him alone.
She does the only thing she can think to please him.

Her father is waiting behind her to catch her when she faints from cutting off her own arm.
The boy calls his uncle a pedophile, but goes no further. Because he’s a narcissist. Because he has dehumanized a living young girl just as much as his uncle has.
His uncle mentions that pruning is sometimes necessary.
A month passes. The boy says he can’t take care of the arm she cut off. He plans to ask Tsutsuji to raise it till it’s a person, though he knows she will joke and say no. But she will probably never truly say no to him. She’s a part of him.
He comes home to a child who looks more like a toddler, and exactly like Tsutsuji.

Tsutsuji’s wound got infected.
Enough to cover most of her body, apparently.
She doesn’t remember the boy. She doesn’t remember seeing the ocean, or the beach. She doesn’t remember how he would play violin for her and her father.
Tsutsuji has fallen back in time.
Her father figure and her brother figure pay it no heed. She’ll grow up again soon. Things will return to what they once were.
And as it is a story from the perspective of Tsutsuji’s abusers, it is calm as it is quietly, terribly evil.
Tsutsuji is a character with her own feelings and thoughts. But she is also a child who has been taught she is not human. She is a child who has been taught that this is her life together with her father. She is a child with a father who depends on her as though she was his own mother.
As a child who has been groomed from the moment she gained awareness, she is not able to recognize predatory behavior. Even the boy’s behavior, speaking of being unable to act as her brother, causes her more distress because she knows she cannot make him happy.
Even when the boy calls his uncle a pedophile, he is too caught up in his own wants to help Tsutsuji. She isn’t her own person. She’s his. She is a detached part of himself, and he wants that. He cannot stop his uncle, because it would mean disrupting their easy life. It doesn’t interfere with his life. There is no reason to stop.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. It's a popular saying. "Beauty doesn't exist on its own. It is created by its beholders." By that logic, the beholder is exhibiting a form of power over what they find beautiful. The eye of the beholder is the fuel behind Helen of Troy. It is what criminalizes her for the sin of what others see her to be. Those with the power will speak of the power of the beheld. A power that is granted.
The eye of the abuser works in the same way. They can view a situation in whatever way most benefits them. Though the boy entering Tsutsuji's life had the choice, he ultimately becomes another abuser in her life, however inadvertently. His uncle only views Tsutsuji's pain in the way that normalizes his own behavior. He does not have to accept culpability for his actions. Not when Tsutsuji reverts to a toddler under his hands.
My abusers got away with this for years.
No matter how often I could joke about such matters.
"Star Lover" is tragic. It's a short horror story. It breaks my heart. In that way, I love it. Rarely do I see depictions of sexual abuse in the very moments that they are happening. To see this experience framed as though a time capsule, a closed pool centered around Tsutsuji's self-destructive decisions, is awful. It shows this without any of the voyeurism I expect from most authors. More than anything, it is almost singularly focused on Tsutsuji's choices, and how the abused are rarely given the interiority that takes their pain seriously by those who abuse them.
I had heard it was a show that had an honest depiction of qualities of sociopathy – even holding a main character with the traits. However, it also sounded almost cringingly edgy. Here are super-human assassins, all of whom fight unceasingly for shady organizations, and here is are the government officials who try to catch them. Throw in dead-eyed women who exist in silence, called Dolls, and it starts to seem like something to pass over.
As it turns out, Darker than Black is very aware of what it is.
With the first two episodes, it cements itself as a “next Tuesday” humanistic story with tinges of a sci-fi that, for a rare moment, is not obsessed with beating off about its world building. Featuring a Chinese main character who encounters well-meant compliments that are shown for the microaggressions they are, featuring women whose interiority is the point of the episode, featuring a range of age and experience that is all affected by the fact that 10 years ago, the world changed and not at all – Darker than Black has a lot to say, but is not very interested in the “Whys” of a science-fantasy wall that makes entire regions of the world disappear.
That focus is its greatest strength.
Scientists throw around phrases that sound like foreign islands. Police name off star systems to disclose superhuman Contractors. But the common person – the people most episodes are about – they don’t have the same words. They don’t know the hidden mysteries of the world. The answers of the Hell’s Gate, the one that is blocked off by a massive wall that bisects Tokyo, are unavailable to the average citizen. Let alone the poor resident, or the undercover agent who is only told enough to survive. In this way, Darker than Black gives tell to what kind of viewer is watching, and the reality of our situations.
Rather than discussing science, or the theories behind why Contractors came to be, the main character talks to a scientist while star-gazing about the fake sky above them. The most the scientist can say is it’s there “Just Because.” There’s no scientific basis for this tragedy and instead, he takes it for what it means to himself. The two of them continue to stare at the sky, because it is an echo of dreams the two of them once had. In the show’s eyes, that’s enough.
In another episode, two contractors spend more time talking about the past, before becoming Contractors. Never the why, never the how. They discuss what mattered before the new sky came, rather than the target they are chasing down. A doll regaining lost memories does not explain why or how she became a doll. Only that she has found something here, something that lets her make the honest choice in what she wants to do. There is no language to explain themselves. Contractors and Dolls only have what words and stereotypes the world has given them. The show, in its own way, is the experience of using questions to find answers that people have not been allowed to have.
This element of the show is striking, but with that honesty in mind, it also displays my favorite quality of the show. That is, the importance of kindness in tragedy.
Tragedy is a genre that inundates the abused and traumatized. It is what most major characters in Darker than Black are heading toward. Or it would be, if not for an in-series awareness of what people like this go through just for the sake of survival.
Tragedy in media has a flawed history. For every empathetic and intelligent depiction, there are a hundred more far more interested in the spectacle of human suffering. Kindness in tragedy is not the narrative of a suicide victim that makes others realize the beauty of life. It is not a terminally ill patient who alights on the shoulders of cynical youth to teach them the flaws of their ways. It is not the person filled with righteous anger and murderous vengeance at the expense of a rape victim, yet again allowed no interiority. It is not the white savior inspired by the injustices of a land they have never been to. It is not the story of a starving worker donating their last dollar to charity. It is not the narrative of the worker who stays in the midst of the fire to keep doing their job. It is not the tale of a person giving up safety for the sake of survival.
Kindness in tragedy is when, even if some tragedies are inevitable, the people involved still try. When an investigator two decades past his prime still does everything in his power to aid a young girl who died years ago. When a young woman beset with the harsh reality of her own trauma and adulthood still wants to open the door for a girl like her. When a girl dealing with the mysterious and suspect deaths of her entire family chooses to believe in magic rather than chasing down an impossible truth to her death. When people have destroyed their lives and died, but come together in their way to give each other a life beyond their assigned fate.
Darker than Black means that people die. That friendships perish and loved ones leave you, betray you. It means the world will not change, so people change themselves. It means that even when the main character knows a woman he is guiding is no longer herself, even when she does not realize what has happened to her, he still helps her as though she is alive. It means that a young girl does not give up on a classmate who has given into how the world expects her to be. It stands for the child who loses one family, and despite the terrible circumstances that lead them to meet, finds a new one in her personal tragedy. It is the man who knows he should not be capable of dreaming, but keeps looking to false stars anyway. It is the sibling who fights because he refuses to accept the monster society has painted his Contractor sister to be.
Kindness in tragedy is the fact that, even if the world says otherwise, individual people are capable of seeing each other as human beings. The hardest part is that there is no easy option. The kindest part is that you can choose more than the binary options, the us-versus-them mentality that plagues institutional society.
The most revolutionary idea in Darker than Black is that people are never just one thing. It’s simple. But the execution is never easy. There is no button that can be pressed to fix the world, no wish that can help everyone. At the end of the day, at the end of mad scientists and corrupt officials, is only the fact that regular people have to change – that they have to acknowledge their evil and their good.
Tokyo is split into two. Who cares how the wall was built or what exactly Hell’s Gate is. What does it matter the materials of the wall or the rational explanations of scientists to explain something that is about much more than equations and elemental composition. To the characters, it is the reflection of their own personal struggle. The constant reflection of Tokyo’s false skyline against a wall is the cast’s lost opportunity to understand what lies on the other side. In the wall, the gate, and the breakdown of both, viewers can only find the reflection of what the cast comes to decide about the people they have chosen to be.



i should say, first, that this is quite a ramble and incredibly melodramatic, as well as self-indulgent, as I just started going on about manate (as i do) while discussing my favorite fic I wrote this year. this is honestly a really navel-gazing mess but i wrote this up a few weeks ago and kept adding to it when i was bored over the weeks, until it was this. so i should really just post it now.